Tag Archives: nle

I Really Like Logic, But …

Response to 9to5 Review of Logic 10.4.x

First of all, thanks to 9to5 for this in-depth review of Logic, not just 3rd party plug-ins – yes, you’re making me eat my words, and in this case I’m happy to. Second, I really like Logic a lot. Third, [and this is very difficult and troubling for me, because I really like Logic], I used to use Logic as an on-set audio tracker and was beginning to use it as a ProTools Replacement for audio post, BUT: There are a couple of issues that Apple has refused to address, even in this latest release, (I’ve tried many times and currently have 3 open support tickets going back to the summer of 2017), and they are both related to Logic’s ability to manage linear time. Here they are:

1) The out point of a project cannot be stretched, after-the-fact if the incoming audio TC transits 21:00:00;00. So, I open a new project, import tracks with the project conforming to the TC of the income audio – here’s the kicker, if the project goes past 21:00:00;00, the outpoint of the project timeline cannot be stretched to include the audio that transits that bearer – even though you can see the grayed-out audio tracks on the timeline. 2) Locking Logic to incoming TC [which is crucial to audio tracking that is slated for audio post with lock-to-picture] mysteriously stops at about 13:00:00;00. I use a Steinberg Nuendo Syncstation to grab House TC and make it available to my audio NLE via the USB port. With Logic all of the setup is obvious [if you do this for a living] and FAST, and, it just works … right up until, 13:00:00;00. What happens next is, Logic stops the recording and will not Play or Record or Freewheel until I disengage the external TC source, in Logic settings.

Much like FCPX is for professions that want to get a lot of work done faster and more efficiently, so too is Logic to the professional in real-world workflows. ProTools is fine, but Logic kills it, and after decades of using ProTools and Avid workflows in general, I’m beyond tired of Avid’s licensing BS. FCPX and Logic, done. But, Apple has got to fix these core TC issues in Logic, and, Apple has got to make a true, out-of-box round-tripping workflow between FCPX and Logic. I really like Apple’s media production tools and they come so dang close to killing everything else out there. Original 9to5 article.

Apple Matters Audio FCPX Logic X Tech Blog Work

iPad Pro – Just Put A Keyboard On It …

 

I’m sorry but seriously – Just put a detachable keyboard on it and face the fact that you’ve got a laptop there – not an iOS device. I’ll even overlook the fact that Microsoft’s already done it – the detachable keyboard – and trust that Apple will get it right. What’s the point? With the work that’s undoubtely going to get done on such a device, a keyboard is only inevitable. Make a MBP and add touch screen, and you’ve got a complete – um, portable computer. The iPad Pro is going to be a laptop with touch screen + keyboard – simple as that.

In-App NLE Notes

 

I think it’s a no-brainer. Being that FCPX happens to be my weapon of choice (the others are good too, and yes, even better at some things), I will speak to that. It’s so nakedly metadata oriented that having a full-fledged note pad built into it was something that I literally went looking for after the first couple of releases – I just thought, “… it’s gotta be in there somewhere …”. Well, it turns out there is a note field of sorts available, and after doing some research sometime ago, I think it has a fairly large character capacity. Of course, what you’re wanting is something that is more tightly integrated with the other relevant metadata of Libraries and Projects, and even the clips themselves. Add a simple but highly functional UI and we’re onto something. One of several features I’d like to see implemented in this scenario is, when the play head reaches a point or range of time where a note has been added, I’d want the ability to toggle on/off on-screen display of those notes. FCP7 kind of did this, showing on-screen (on the Canvas) whatever text had been added to a marker. Seems the infrastructure is there in FCPX, it just needs to be developed. It’s a good idea, and I might argue, an important one.

THX! @Alex4D – FCPX TC Overlays

 

Thanks @Alex4D! This is very cool and badly needed in our FCPX workflow where I work. For now I’ll be the only one using it to be sure it doesn’t break anything that might be vital, but I look forward to implementing this for all seven edit bays once the dust settles with all the new Apple stuff coming out this Fall.

For whatever it’s worth: I tried this in El Capitan on my home computer, (after making, renaming and relocating a copy of the FCPX app.). Works like a charm. I stacked up to 10 video clips and the Overlay showed up for each one, including a few audio-only clips. I was curioius to see how it would handle a Multicam Clip, so I experimented with that a little too.

Once you put the Multicam Clip on the timeline the TC Overlay only indicates where the playhead is on the timeline. I haven’t decided how important it might be to see the TC of the embedded clips in the Overlay, but I can immediately say that it would be nice. If you double-click on the Multicam clip and expaned it on the timeline you will then be able to see the TC of each clip in the Overlay, which, is great in those instances where one or more of the clips is just a bit off. It can also be useful on those rare occasions when you want to manually add more clips to an existing Multicam Clip and not all of the camera TC matches for the same Scene and Take.

Roles Trump Tracks – Mostly

Anyone Who Prefers Tracks Over Roles is Delusional. http://t.co/oewCXfWqSy via @fcpxpert1

I’m beginning to need more advanced output options when finishing work in FCPX and I can already see some of the potential power with this metadata-centric tool. However, I know I’m already missing one thing, and probably just the one, so far [four years in FCPX]: Bussing. You could kind of do this in FCP7 by dropping audio and video filters on clips while they were still in the browser, (many complained that there was no effects buss for the master audio buss in FCP7), but of course, PP does this best. I really loved the fact that I could create a realtime mixer from audio tracks that were setup on the timeline, even without clips! So I could have a dialog track with preset EQ and processing and every clip I dropped onto that track took on those charactersitics. At times that is/was a big plus for me, but, still not worth giving up FCPX.

Laboratory Malware/Attacks/Viruses

I really have to wonder about the behind-the-scenes politics of people and organizations that create previously non-existent malware. On the surface I get it, but it seems dubious that a person or group that creates mechanisms that break the average desktop or handheld computer have only altruistic motivations. Here’s just a concern or three that I have:

  1. What happens when this person’s or group’s admiration for the computing system they portend to love wanes?
  2. How long does it take for that love to wane in light of the admitted lack of appreciation that comes from the manufacturer/developer.
  3. Whether or not there is/was any real admiration by the malware creator, what would it take to buy that particular creator’s particular creation?
  4. I see no regulation or oversight of any kind for this practice.

Certainly germ warfare development [bio-germs] takes place, but it is somewhat regulated by the realization of the people doing the hands-on development, of just how really dangerous what they’re working with is. I would also argue that, whatever of this kind of thing goes on in the USA is watched very closely, even if it is not strictly regulated, (and I’m not saying it’s not – I don’t know if it is or not). Why would it be closely watched? For two reasons: To keep it secret and because it’s just dangerous to all concerned, and no risks can afford to be taken.

Now back to the malware lab where it seems to me that this kind of thing is carried out with no oversight of any kind, and if this thing shows up in the wild 12-24 months from now this person will have no culpability except, “I told you so”.

Sorry, but I don’t believe this practice should be geek fodder, because there is a lot at stake – potentially, even human life – since computers are so indelible to our existence now. The more this is contemplated the more I think this practice needs to be reigned in – there needs to be official oversight. It’s really too bad that giant companies like Microsoft and Apple, and Google, and all the rest, don’t do this all in-house – with government oversight. Software development has too long enjoyed the luxury of getting us to completely depend on products that take absolutely no responsibility for outcomes or losses due to the product’s shortcomings.